Saturday, March 26, 2011

How does ethnocentricity cause conflict?


When the British arrived to a place called ‘Walang’ which is now called as Sydney, they met a tribe of people. Hence, the British called them, the ‘First Australians’ and even called as the aboriginals. The First Australians were black, and believed in spirits of souls of the nature and had different lifestyles. They did not have clothes on but hold spears in their hands which seemed barbarous. The British’s target was to try to connect and interact with the native Australians wisely. However, their culture to Britain’s culture was totally different so they could not adapt to their settlement each other. Plus, British’s discrimination and bias perspectives, caused by ethnocentrism to the natives, leaded to the unsuccessful result of their achievement. Furthermore, many of the disrespectful British still thought that natives were violent and wild savages. Effects by these aspects were that British decided to push native Australians away from their homeland, Sydney. Thus, British dug all the native crops and replaced British’s familiar crops like corns and potatoes. On top of that the change in their living, caused by another effect, was unacceptable to British so they determined to set ethnocentric views. However, their ethnocentric views caused a huge problem. While Bennelong was gone to England, the balance of the tribe and power became weak. The First Australians were starving because of lacking food supplies. They could not eat other crops and could not have rights to plant their native crops. A man called ‘Pemulwuy’ could not ignore this situation so he took such a brave actions to revenge. His strategy was to set fire on British’s farms and crops. As this kept happening British was furious. They ferociously killed Pemulwuy and put his head in the beer jar, than sent it to their home country which showed their victory. Unfortunately, the First Australians could not give any of their traditional burial because his head was gone. After few ages, British execute a number of First Australians who lived around the surface of Australia and kidnapped their children. The British was also racism. For instance, they educated the native Australian children and got them married to whites so that they can be whiter. By their greediness to get settled on the lands, they forced some tribes of people to go over the fence so that they can never come back to their own land. Consequently, the British colonizers were selfish, violent, bias and unsympathetic to the culture of the First Australians. If they had ignored their ethnocentric views and accepted the different lifestyle of the First Australians, the war and severe relationships could be prevented. Ethnocentricity should be abandoned.



Tuesday, March 15, 2011

The Rabbits

Write a well-developed paragraph explaining what you believe is the most important message of "The Rabbits." You will be sharing your paragraph with your table group.

My opinion ahead to the story might be different or wrong but I portrayed an image of Australians and British to prove my view of important message. The numbats symbolizes the Western Austrailans and the fassions of Rabbits are similar to British. Furthermore, the life style and equipments they use are totally different. This way I knew that this story is going to be similar to the history of Australia. To give an short summary of "The Rabbits", the rabbits came over to the new land and start to colonize. Rabbits just started to build their new industries and buildings. They fought but the numbats lost, than the rabbits took over their whole land. Numbets were genocided. Then, the numbats couldn't stop the rabbits. I believe that this book's most important message is that people's ambition is too greedy and if they keep doing it, they will not able to stop them. Thus, before someone does something which ruin the others' entire lives, someone should fight against them to stop like an hero.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Julius Caesar: Solo/Duet Performance Assesment

For this Julius Caesar Performing Assesment, I chose Brutus to perform alone. Act 3.2, line 12 -31 is what I am going to perform. In this scene, Brutus killed Caesar in front of Pompey's statue in the Senate and is convincing public to be on his side. He sets his honour and justice in his speech and patriotism for people to make sure that he did right thing to kill Caesar.

Brutus :

Be patient till the last.

Romans, contrymen, and lovers, hear me for my cause, and

be silent, that you may hear. Believe me for mine honour, and

have respect to mine honour, that you may believe. Censure

me in your wisdom, and wake your sense, that you may the

better judge. If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend

of Caesar's, to him I say that friend demand why Brutus rose against

Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but

that I loved Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living,

and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free

men? As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was

fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him, but,

as he was ambitious, I slew him. There is tears, for his love;

joy, for his fortune; honour, for his valour; and death, for his

ambition. Who is here so base, that would be a bondman? If

any, speak; for him have I offended. Who is here so rude, that

would not be a Roman? If any, speak; for him have I offened.

Who is here so rude, that would not be a Roman? If any, speak;

for him have I offended. Who is here so vile, that will not love his

country? If any, speak; for him have I offended. I pause for a reply.

It is significant because this quote shows lots of Brutus' honor, brave and arragont. Furthermore, in this scene, he becomes very sneaky, cunning and forceful to the publiens. He shows his patriotism to cast that it was all for the general good of Rome to have liberty, freedom and justice. If he did not say these out to Romans, they could not belive in him that killing Caesar was right to be all free men. They also would not honour him and have respect him because Brutus was Caesar's friend. Killing friendship to the dead line is likely as terrible murder. Therefore, Brutus was so passionate and loyal that he could change crime to murder like an alchemist.